Thomas Reid is seen as the predecessor to Alvin Plantinga. The latter holds to a “warrant” view of epistemology: I don’t have to justify endless justifications for foundational beliefs. Plantinga draws heavily from Reid.
Yet here is a thought: can one hold to an internalist epistemology (knowledge = justified, true belief) and incorporate many of Reid’s insights? I think one certain can on issues like anthropology and the will.
I haven’t read Reid yet, so I’ll ask: did Reid develop a concept of warrant? Or is that a modern innovation?
LikeLike
Reid had an embryonic concept of warrant. Plantinga draws heavily upon him. Yet Reid is more known for the second part of Plantinga’s work: proper function.
Reid seems like a proto-Plantingian, and he probably is, but he is also a foundationalist, albeit a weak one.
LikeLike