By J. B. Aitken
Hillary must start WWIII by 2017 if she wants to have any semblance of Atlanticist domination. Even then, the price might be too high.
Atlantis at the Threshold
Atlanticism, following Dugin, is the geopolitical reality that prioritizes trade and commerce. It is the Platonic form of Carthage and Tyre. It’s god is a variant of Ba’al. It opposes itself to Eternal Rome, the notion of a Tellurcratic society. That society prioritizes tradition and stability. The DC/London/Brussels nexus is the locus of Atlanticism.
But Atlanticism is quite interested in “land.” Specifically, it is interested in trade routes that can also function as “funnels” into land-based empires. This explains the Beltway insistence on foreign military actions and adventures that really don’t make sense. DC’s goal is quite simple, and is documented by a host of scholars (Dugin, Engdahl, Johnson et al). It must surround Russia and take advantage of Russia’s lack of geographical borders. This allows manifestations of Atlantist, notably NATO, key invasion routes.
The Beast Thwarted?
The most obvious invasion route is through Western Russia. While STRATFOR analyst George Friedman is almost always wrong about Russia, he did raise several interesting points: you can draw a line from Moscow to Rostov and everything West of it is the European peninsula. This means Moscow is very close to “The West.” Take away the buffer of Ukraine, and Moscow can be invaded from two points, from Kiev and from the Baltics.
But things did not go according to Soros’s plans. Novorossiya arose from the ashes of Ukraine and removed any invasion route from the south. Therefore, Atlantis can only reach Moscow from the West.
Maintaining Air Dominance
No one disputes traditional NATO air superiority, but this must be placed in a context. Saddam Hussein didn’t have advanced missile systems. Serbia had out-dated Soviet defenses and still shot down American planes. How will NATO fare against S-400 missiles in 2016? If Hillary attacks now (which is the only issue that matters in the 2016 presidential race), can we expect something like 70% air casualties, even assuming a technical NATO victory? Russian defense systems are expected to be at the S-500 or even S-600 level in 2018. Not only can Russia negate NATO nuclear superiority, she will knock every NATO plane out of the sky.
But…
Of course, this assumes that NATO attacks first. What if Russia refuses to be caught off-guard and initiates its own attack? The RAND corporation has admitted that Russia can overrun the Baltics in 60 hours (of course, holding those gains is another scenario, but neither bodes well for the West).
Wild Cards
The above analysis assumes that this will be a NATO vs. Russia war. In reality it will be no such thing. Any war with Russia will be a war with China, and a war with China won’t be merely physical, it will be also economic (Cf Johnson 2016).
I suspect Hillary knows all of this, which is why the Pentagon/gram and Hillary are in such a strained mental state. They have to act in order for the New World Order to continue, yet they know such an action will be their doom.
Rationality as Worship 